Filename: tables_figs_appendix

This document conatains supplementary material, mostly tables and figures, as well as some additional text and description. Eventually, this could be rendered as a Word Doc or PDF for an appendix corresponding to a submitted manuscript.

The tables and figures intended for the main text are here:

~/green-space-denver/docs/tables_figs_appendix.html

As of now, this also contains all of the information presented in the main text. That is, the tables and figures presented in the main text are a subset of those presented here.

1 Denver demographics

1.1 Table of total population, population density, age, race, and poverty of study area

Table 1.1: Summary of study-area demographics
Measure value
area_mi2 154.70
pop_tot 715878.00
pop_dens_mi2 4627.61
race_w_prop 0.54
race_b_prop 0.09
race_h_prop 0.30
race_o_prop 0.07
age_med 34.70
pov_last_12_prop 0.12
hh_inc_med 73003.00

1.2 Map population density by block group

1.3 Map median age by census tract

1.4 Map race (proportion non-white) by census tract

1.5 Map percent in poverty in last 12 months by census tract

1.6 Map median household income by census tract

2 Native-plants polygons

2.1 Map of native-plants polygons

2.2 NDVI of native-plants polygons

Table 2.1: NDVI of selected places of varying levels of plant nativity on selected cloud-free summer (May, June, July, August) days over five years (2016-2021)
Place type Place name Area (acres) Area (sq. mi.) NDVI, mean NDVI, 25th-ile NDVI, 50th-ile NDVI, 75th-ile
high diversity Chatfield Meadow Restoration 0.1 0.00 0.48 0.47 0.50 0.50
high diversity Chatfield Prairie Garden 0.1 0.00 0.37 0.35 0.37 0.37
high diversity City Park Greenhouses 0.2 0.00 0.31 0.27 0.28 0.28
high diversity Denver Botanic Gardens Green Roof 0.3 0.00 0.34 0.34 0.36 0.36
high diversity Kenderick Lake Xeriscape Garden 0.8 0.00 0.40 0.36 0.37 0.37
native spectrum Denver Botanic Gardens, 100% Native 0.5 0.00 0.54 0.52 0.55 0.55
native spectrum Plains Conservation Center, 100% Native 18.2 0.03 0.16 0.23 0.26 0.26
native spectrum Green Mountain Park, 85% Native 1917.7 3.00 0.42 0.36 0.40 0.40
native spectrum Hogback along C-470, 75% Native 29.7 0.05 0.36 0.32 0.35 0.35
native spectrum Suburban Open Space 1, Chatfield H.S., 50% Native 3.7 0.01 0.40 0.37 0.41 0.41
native spectrum Suburban Open Space 2, Columbine Hills Church, 30% Native 4.6 0.01 0.36 0.26 0.31 0.31
native spectrum Denver Botanic Gardens at Chatfield, 10% Native 2.2 0.00 0.53 0.40 0.54 0.54
native spectrum City Park, 0% Native 61.2 0.10 0.67 0.67 0.70 0.70

3 Equity indices

Both the State of Colorado and the City of Denver have created equity indices to guide their work. The Colorado Department of Public Health & Environment (CDPHE) describes their equity index here1 and makes the index available for download here.2 The City of Denver Department of Public Health & Environment (DDPHE) describes the neighborhood-level equity index here3 and makes the data available for download here.4

Note that for the CDPHE index, a higher score is a worse score, whereas for the DDPHE index, a lower score is a worse score. The map below presents tertiles of each score.

Figure 3.1: Comparing equity indices

Below are results of a chi-square test comparing tertiles of CDPHE Equity Index vs the DDPHE Equity index.

## 
##  Pearson's Chi-squared test
## 
## data:  table(compare_tertiles$equity_bg_cdphe_tertile_den, compare_tertiles$equity_nbhd_denver_tertile)
## X-squared = 319.81, df = 4, p-value < 2.2e-16

4 Visualization of scenarios

Note to self: This section is mostly copied from ~green-space-denver/docs/hia-results.Rmd

4.1 Scenario 1: fixed proportion of all block groups

The weighted block-group-level mean NDVI on July 4, 2021 is presented here.

Figure 4.1: Mean normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI) of census block groups in Denver, Colorado (excluding some in the northeast, described in main text) on July 4, 2021 as measured by the Landsat-8 satellite on July 4, 2021. NDVI is measured at a spatial resolution of 30 meters squared. The weighted block-group-level mean NDVI is weighted by the proportion Landsat pixels overlap the water-free land area of the block group

For each definition of native-plants NDVI, We excluded census blocks whose baseline NDVI was above the threshold. This map visualizes the NDVI cutoffs both for lower of the two values, that of the Denver Botanic Gardens Green Roof, and the higher of the two, that of Denver Botanic Gardens Native Plot.

4.2 Scenario 2: riparian areas

We measured NDVI in a 200-foot buffer, a 100-foot buffer, and a 50-foot buffer around all bodies of water in Denver. We downloaded bodies of water from OpenStreetMap (code here). We defined residential exposure to these riparian areas as those individuals living within a 500-meter buffer.

The below map depicts mean NDVI in the portions of census block groups that intersect a 200-foot buffer as well as those pieces that intersect the part of the 500 m buffer that would not be intervened upon, i.e., the part between the 200-foot buffer and the edge of the 500 m residential buffer.

4.3 Scenario 3: green infrastructure

4.3.1 Scenario 3.1. stormwater retention projects

We were provided a list of planned projects throughout Denver. Per our conversations, we assume that about 75% of the project’s footprint would consist of native or vegetation. Like for riparian areas, we defined exposure to the projects as those individuals living within a 500 m buffer of the projects. A map of baseline NDVI of the projects themselves and of a 500 m residential buffer around the projects is below.

4.3.2 Scenario 3.2. Site new or re-development storwmater controls

A regulatory scenario suggested by this agency is stormwater controls on new and re-development to offset the negative impacts to flooding and water quality due to the increase in impervious surfaces added by development. These stormwater control measures would add vegetation using native or adapted plants. The approach for estimating the health impact of the redevelopment controls is distinct in that we will not know where the re-developments will occur. We thus simulated possible locations. Per our conversations with the stakeholder, we anticipate the following number of parcels will be subject to these rules per year:

  • greater than 1 acre: about 100 sites per year
  • 0.5-1.0 acre: about 25 sites per year
  • less than 0.5 acre: 400 sites per year

We gathered data on parcels from Denver’s Open Data Portal (Existing Landuse 2018) and measured their area. A subset of these parcels near Union Station is mapped below. (Mapping all parcels is too much data to present.)

Then, from all parcels, we sampled 100 sites of size greater than 1 acre, 25 sites of size 0.5-1 acre, and 400 sites less than 0.5 acres. One such sample appears below.

From this point, we followed the same framework as for other scenarios. The baseline NDVI of the sampled parcels and that of their corresponding 500m buffers is visualized below.

4.4 Scenario 4: parking lots

Finally, we propose replacing a portion of parking-lot surface with native plants. Denver’s area is about 9% parking lot (below table). We obtained spatial data on parking lots from the City of Denver Open Data Catalog.5

Table 4.1: Proportion of Denver’s area covered by parking lots
Total area (mi2), parking lots Total area (mi2), Denver proportion parking lots
13.57 155 0.09

We similarly measured the NDVI on the parking lots as well as the NDVI in the census block groups within a 500-m buffer radius of any parking lot (which is almost the whole city). We present a small subset of these areas near Union Station (the data are too large to upload):

5 Supplementary tables

These tables are expanded versions of the corresponding main-text tables. They include a few more sub-scenarios, varying, for example, the percentage of land that would be converted to native plants (Scenarios 1 and 4) or the buffer size around the riparian areas (Scenario 2).

5.1 Table 1: Description of scenarios (area, pop affecteds)

Table 5.1: The cumulative area of the treatment, its corresponding residential buffer, and the population affected
Scenario num. Scenario Sub-scenario Equity Tertile Area, treatment (mi2), Med. Area, treatment (mi2), LL Area, treatment (mi2), UL Area, residential buffer (mi2), Med. Area, residential buffer (mi2), LL Area, residential buffer (mi2), UL Pop. affected, est. Pop. affected, LL Pop. affected, UL
1 all-bg 100-pct NA 68.0 41.5 93.5 68.0 41.5 93.5 287,158 149,653 390,671
1 all-bg 100-pct [1.6,2.5] 31.6 20.7 35.7 31.6 20.7 35.7 122,875 64,028 145,412
1 all-bg 100-pct (2.5,3.5] 18.0 9.0 29.4 18.0 9.0 29.4 101,604 50,805 146,412
1 all-bg 100-pct (3.5,4.7] 18.4 11.8 28.5 18.4 11.8 28.5 62,679 31,896 102,882
1 all-bg 30-pct NA 68.0 41.5 93.5 68.0 41.5 93.5 287,158 148,940 390,332
1 all-bg 30-pct [1.6,2.5] 31.6 20.7 35.7 31.6 20.7 35.7 122,875 64,171 145,380
1 all-bg 30-pct (2.5,3.5] 18.0 9.0 29.4 18.0 9.0 29.4 101,604 50,685 145,860
1 all-bg 30-pct (3.5,4.7] 18.4 11.8 28.5 18.4 11.8 28.5 62,679 31,891 102,756
1 all-bg 20-pct NA 68.0 41.5 93.5 68.0 41.5 93.5 287,158 148,994 392,070
1 all-bg 20-pct [1.6,2.5] 31.6 20.7 35.7 31.6 20.7 35.7 122,875 63,818 145,525
1 all-bg 20-pct (2.5,3.5] 18.0 9.0 29.4 18.0 9.0 29.4 101,604 50,906 146,171
1 all-bg 20-pct (3.5,4.7] 18.4 11.8 28.5 18.4 11.8 28.5 62,679 32,017 102,852
2 riparian 200-ft NA 4.0 2.6 5.8 35.1 22.9 48.7 130,341 68,283 184,859
2 riparian 200-ft [1.6,2.5] 1.9 1.1 2.2 17.1 10.0 19.9 63,178 26,565 78,489
2 riparian 200-ft (2.5,3.5] 0.9 0.6 1.9 7.9 4.9 14.1 38,605 21,084 62,097
2 riparian 200-ft (3.5,4.7] 1.2 0.9 1.7 10.1 8.0 14.7 28,558 19,351 46,504
2 riparian 100-ft NA 2.0 1.3 2.9 35.1 22.9 48.7 130,341 68,432 185,310
2 riparian 100-ft [1.6,2.5] 0.9 0.6 1.1 17.1 10.0 19.9 63,178 26,647 78,777
2 riparian 100-ft (2.5,3.5] 0.5 0.3 0.9 7.9 4.9 14.1 38,605 20,999 61,795
2 riparian 100-ft (3.5,4.7] 0.6 0.4 0.8 10.1 8.0 14.7 28,558 19,268 46,381
2 riparian 50-ft NA 1.0 0.6 1.4 35.1 22.9 48.7 130,341 68,133 185,218
2 riparian 50-ft [1.6,2.5] 0.5 0.3 0.5 17.1 10.0 19.9 63,178 26,479 78,638
2 riparian 50-ft (2.5,3.5] 0.2 0.1 0.5 7.9 4.9 14.1 38,605 21,078 61,829
2 riparian 50-ft (3.5,4.7] 0.3 0.2 0.4 10.1 8.0 14.7 28,558 19,339 46,624
3 ogi ogi_proj NA 0.6 0.4 0.6 14.1 9.3 15.8 67,770 43,893 77,417
3 ogi ogi_proj [1.6,2.5] 0.4 0.3 0.4 9.4 5.8 9.8 39,235 20,210 43,269
3 ogi ogi_proj (2.5,3.5] 0.1 0.1 0.1 2.3 1.8 3.0 15,900 13,100 20,119
3 ogi ogi_proj (3.5,4.7] 0.1 0.1 0.1 2.4 1.7 3.0 12,635 9,267 15,232
3 ogi parcel NA 0.6 0.4 0.8 55.0 32.9 74.2 234,251 121,095 318,065
3 ogi parcel [1.6,2.5] 0.2 0.2 0.2 24.7 16.2 28.1 97,900 52,057 116,062
3 ogi parcel (2.5,3.5] 0.1 0.1 0.2 15.1 6.9 22.0 84,442 39,879 116,598
3 ogi parcel (3.5,4.7] 0.3 0.2 0.4 15.2 9.8 24.2 51,909 27,461 88,617
4 prkng 100-pct NA 8.7 7.1 9.5 68.0 41.6 92.3 285,431 149,683 384,124
4 prkng 100-pct [1.6,2.5] 4.4 3.8 4.4 31.7 20.8 35.5 122,563 64,105 142,983
4 prkng 100-pct (2.5,3.5] 2.1 1.6 2.6 17.9 9.0 29.1 101,075 51,302 144,454
4 prkng 100-pct (3.5,4.7] 2.2 1.8 2.4 18.4 11.8 27.7 61,793 32,474 99,873
4 prkng 50-pct NA 8.7 7.1 9.5 68.0 41.6 92.3 285,431 149,831 383,455
4 prkng 50-pct [1.6,2.5] 4.4 3.8 4.4 31.7 20.8 35.5 122,563 64,189 142,724
4 prkng 50-pct (2.5,3.5] 2.1 1.6 2.6 17.9 9.0 29.1 101,075 51,223 144,395
4 prkng 50-pct (3.5,4.7] 2.2 1.8 2.4 18.4 11.8 27.7 61,793 32,371 99,390
4 prkng 30-pct NA 8.7 7.1 9.5 68.0 41.6 92.3 285,431 149,461 383,399
4 prkng 30-pct [1.6,2.5] 4.4 3.8 4.4 31.7 20.8 35.5 122,563 63,960 142,843
4 prkng 30-pct (2.5,3.5] 2.1 1.6 2.6 17.9 9.0 29.1 101,075 50,838 144,768
4 prkng 30-pct (3.5,4.7] 2.2 1.8 2.4 18.4 11.8 27.7 61,793 32,482 99,848

5.2 Table 2: NDVI at baseline, alternative, and difference therein

Table 5.2: NDVI before, after, and difference
Scenario num. Scenario Sub-scenario Equity Tertile Baseline NDVI, tx area, Med. Baseline NDVI, tx area, LL Baseline NDVI, tx area, UL Baseline NDVI, res. area, Med. Baseline NDVI, res. area, LL Baseline NDVI, res. area, UL Alternative NDVI, res. area, Med. Alternative NDVI, res. area, LL Alternative NDVI, res. area, UL Difference: NDVI, res. area, Med. Difference: NDVI, res. area, LL Difference: NDVI, res. area, UL
1 all-bg 100-pct NA 0.29 0.23 0.34 0.29 0.23 0.34 0.42 0.34 0.54 0.125 0.112 0.202
1 all-bg 100-pct [1.6,2.5] 0.28 0.22 0.30 0.28 0.22 0.30 0.42 0.34 0.54 0.138 0.120 0.242
1 all-bg 100-pct (2.5,3.5] 0.32 0.26 0.38 0.32 0.26 0.38 0.42 0.34 0.54 0.093 0.085 0.161
1 all-bg 100-pct (3.5,4.7] 0.28 0.23 0.35 0.28 0.23 0.35 0.42 0.34 0.54 0.135 0.119 0.195
1 all-bg 30-pct NA 0.29 0.23 0.34 0.29 0.23 0.34 0.33 0.27 0.40 0.037 0.034 0.061
1 all-bg 30-pct [1.6,2.5] 0.28 0.22 0.30 0.28 0.22 0.30 0.32 0.26 0.37 0.041 0.036 0.073
1 all-bg 30-pct (2.5,3.5] 0.32 0.26 0.38 0.32 0.26 0.38 0.35 0.29 0.43 0.028 0.025 0.048
1 all-bg 30-pct (3.5,4.7] 0.28 0.23 0.35 0.28 0.23 0.35 0.32 0.26 0.40 0.040 0.036 0.058
1 all-bg 20-pct NA 0.29 0.23 0.34 0.29 0.23 0.34 0.32 0.25 0.38 0.025 0.022 0.040
1 all-bg 20-pct [1.6,2.5] 0.28 0.22 0.30 0.28 0.22 0.30 0.31 0.25 0.35 0.028 0.024 0.048
1 all-bg 20-pct (2.5,3.5] 0.32 0.26 0.38 0.32 0.26 0.38 0.34 0.28 0.41 0.019 0.017 0.032
1 all-bg 20-pct (3.5,4.7] 0.28 0.23 0.35 0.28 0.23 0.35 0.31 0.25 0.38 0.027 0.024 0.039
2 riparian 200-ft NA 0.34 0.30 0.39 0.28 0.22 0.33 0.29 0.23 0.35 0.008 0.005 0.018
2 riparian 200-ft [1.6,2.5] 0.34 0.27 0.36 0.28 0.20 0.30 0.29 0.21 0.32 0.009 0.008 0.020
2 riparian 200-ft (2.5,3.5] 0.35 0.31 0.43 0.30 0.25 0.38 0.31 0.26 0.39 0.008 0.004 0.015
2 riparian 200-ft (3.5,4.7] 0.34 0.31 0.38 0.26 0.23 0.32 0.27 0.23 0.34 0.009 0.004 0.019
2 riparian 100-ft NA 0.37 0.32 0.41 0.28 0.22 0.33 0.28 0.22 0.34 0.003 0.001 0.008
2 riparian 100-ft [1.6,2.5] 0.37 0.30 0.39 0.28 0.20 0.30 0.28 0.21 0.31 0.003 0.002 0.008
2 riparian 100-ft (2.5,3.5] 0.38 0.34 0.45 0.30 0.25 0.38 0.30 0.25 0.38 0.002 0.000 0.006
2 riparian 100-ft (3.5,4.7] 0.37 0.34 0.40 0.26 0.23 0.32 0.26 0.23 0.33 0.003 0.000 0.008
2 riparian 50-ft NA 0.38 0.33 0.42 0.28 0.22 0.33 0.28 0.22 0.33 0.001 0.000 0.004
2 riparian 50-ft [1.6,2.5] 0.38 0.31 0.40 0.28 0.20 0.30 0.28 0.20 0.31 0.001 0.001 0.004
2 riparian 50-ft (2.5,3.5] 0.40 0.35 0.46 0.30 0.25 0.38 0.30 0.25 0.38 0.001 0.000 0.003
2 riparian 50-ft (3.5,4.7] 0.39 0.35 0.41 0.26 0.23 0.32 0.26 0.23 0.32 0.001 0.000 0.004
3 ogi ogi_proj NA 0.38 0.33 0.39 0.27 0.21 0.29 0.27 0.21 0.29 0.001 0.000 0.004
3 ogi ogi_proj [1.6,2.5] 0.39 0.38 0.40 0.28 0.23 0.29 0.28 0.23 0.29 0.001 -0.001 0.004
3 ogi ogi_proj (2.5,3.5] 0.35 0.23 0.38 0.25 0.21 0.29 0.25 0.21 0.30 0.003 0.002 0.004
3 ogi ogi_proj (3.5,4.7] 0.38 0.24 0.38 0.24 0.17 0.28 0.24 0.17 0.28 0.003 0.001 0.005
3 ogi parcel NA 0.24 0.19 0.31 0.30 0.24 0.34 0.30 0.24 0.34 0.001 0.001 0.001
3 ogi parcel [1.6,2.5] 0.19 0.16 0.20 0.29 0.24 0.30 0.29 0.24 0.31 0.001 0.001 0.001
3 ogi parcel (2.5,3.5] 0.27 0.24 0.45 0.33 0.26 0.37 0.33 0.26 0.37 0.000 0.000 0.000
3 ogi parcel (3.5,4.7] 0.26 0.21 0.28 0.29 0.23 0.35 0.29 0.23 0.35 0.002 0.002 0.002
4 prkng 100-pct NA 0.16 0.15 0.17 0.29 0.23 0.34 0.32 0.27 0.37 0.034 0.032 0.038
4 prkng 100-pct [1.6,2.5] 0.15 0.13 0.15 0.28 0.22 0.30 0.31 0.26 0.34 0.038 0.037 0.049
4 prkng 100-pct (2.5,3.5] 0.20 0.19 0.21 0.32 0.26 0.38 0.35 0.29 0.41 0.028 0.026 0.029
4 prkng 100-pct (3.5,4.7] 0.16 0.14 0.17 0.28 0.23 0.34 0.31 0.26 0.38 0.031 0.031 0.033
4 prkng 50-pct NA 0.16 0.15 0.17 0.29 0.23 0.34 0.31 0.25 0.35 0.017 0.016 0.019
4 prkng 50-pct [1.6,2.5] 0.15 0.13 0.15 0.28 0.22 0.30 0.30 0.24 0.32 0.019 0.018 0.024
4 prkng 50-pct (2.5,3.5] 0.20 0.19 0.21 0.32 0.26 0.38 0.33 0.27 0.39 0.014 0.013 0.015
4 prkng 50-pct (3.5,4.7] 0.16 0.14 0.17 0.28 0.23 0.34 0.30 0.24 0.36 0.015 0.015 0.016
4 prkng 30-pct NA 0.16 0.15 0.17 0.29 0.23 0.34 0.30 0.24 0.35 0.010 0.010 0.011
4 prkng 30-pct [1.6,2.5] 0.15 0.13 0.15 0.28 0.22 0.30 0.29 0.23 0.31 0.012 0.011 0.015
4 prkng 30-pct (2.5,3.5] 0.20 0.19 0.21 0.32 0.26 0.38 0.33 0.27 0.39 0.008 0.008 0.009
4 prkng 30-pct (3.5,4.7] 0.16 0.14 0.17 0.28 0.23 0.34 0.29 0.24 0.35 0.009 0.009 0.010

5.3 Table 3: Estimated deaths averted (total and rate per 100k) under each scenario

Table 5.3: Estimated deaths averted
Scenario num. Scenario Sub-scenario Equity Tertile Deaths prevented, est. Deaths prevented, LL Deaths prevented, UL Deaths prevented per 100k, est. Deaths prevented per 100k, LL Deaths prevented per 100k, UL
1 all-bg 100-pct NA 112 46 322 39 30 83
1 all-bg 100-pct [1.6,2.5] 43 15 126 35 22 88
1 all-bg 100-pct (2.5,3.5] 38 14 119 37 26 82
1 all-bg 100-pct (3.5,4.7] 31 13 89 52 37 88
1 all-bg 30-pct NA 33 13 92 11 9 24
1 all-bg 30-pct [1.6,2.5] 13 4 36 10 7 25
1 all-bg 30-pct (2.5,3.5] 11 4 34 11 8 24
1 all-bg 30-pct (3.5,4.7] 9 4 26 15 11 26
1 all-bg 20-pct NA 22 9 62 8 6 16
1 all-bg 20-pct [1.6,2.5] 8 3 24 7 4 17
1 all-bg 20-pct (2.5,3.5] 7 3 23 7 5 16
1 all-bg 20-pct (3.5,4.7] 6 3 17 10 7 17
2 riparian 200-ft NA 3 1 13 3 1 7
2 riparian 200-ft [1.6,2.5] 1 0 5 1 1 6
2 riparian 200-ft (2.5,3.5] 1 0 5 3 0 9
2 riparian 200-ft (3.5,4.7] 1 0 4 4 2 9
2 riparian 100-ft NA 1 0 5 0 0 3
2 riparian 100-ft [1.6,2.5] 0 0 1 0 0 2
2 riparian 100-ft (2.5,3.5] 0 0 2 1 -1 3
2 riparian 100-ft (3.5,4.7] 0 0 2 1 0 4
2 riparian 50-ft NA 0 0 2 0 0 1
2 riparian 50-ft [1.6,2.5] 0 0 1 0 0 1
2 riparian 50-ft (2.5,3.5] 0 0 1 0 -1 1
2 riparian 50-ft (3.5,4.7] 0 0 1 1 0 2
3 ogi ogi_proj NA 1 0 2 1 0 3
3 ogi ogi_proj [1.6,2.5] 0 0 2 1 -1 5
3 ogi ogi_proj (2.5,3.5] 0 0 0 1 1 2
3 ogi ogi_proj (3.5,4.7] 0 0 0 0 -1 2
3 ogi parcel NA 0 0 1 0 0 0
3 ogi parcel [1.6,2.5] 0 0 0 0 0 0
3 ogi parcel (2.5,3.5] 0 0 0 0 0 0
3 ogi parcel (3.5,4.7] 0 0 0 0 0 0
4 prkng 100-pct NA 27 13 51 10 9 13
4 prkng 100-pct [1.6,2.5] 11 5 20 9 8 14
4 prkng 100-pct (2.5,3.5] 11 5 21 11 9 15
4 prkng 100-pct (3.5,4.7] 6 3 12 10 7 13
4 prkng 50-pct NA 14 7 25 5 4 7
4 prkng 50-pct [1.6,2.5] 5 3 10 5 4 7
4 prkng 50-pct (2.5,3.5] 5 2 11 5 4 8
4 prkng 50-pct (3.5,4.7] 3 1 6 5 4 6
4 prkng 30-pct NA 8 4 15 3 3 4
4 prkng 30-pct [1.6,2.5] 3 2 6 3 2 4
4 prkng 30-pct (2.5,3.5] 3 1 6 3 3 4
4 prkng 30-pct (3.5,4.7] 2 1 4 3 2 4

References

1.
CDPHE. Climate Equity Data Viewer. Published online September 13, 2021. https://storymaps.arcgis.com/stories/46bf289f92bc4629a0a1266de4bb7f97
2.
CDPHE. Climate Equity Data Viewer Scores. https://drive.google.com/file/d/1iwUYHeHucpe9gaBMgb_UMOrS7mDGAftM/view
3.
DDPHE. Denver Neighborhood Equity Index. https://www.arcgis.com/apps/MapJournal/index.html?appid=2f30c73e83204e96824a14680a62a18e
4.
Denver. Denver open data catalog: Equity index 2020 - neighborhood. https://www.denvergov.org/opendata/dataset/city-and-county-of-denver-equity-index-2020-neighborhood
5.
Denver open data catalog: Parking lots. Published online 2016. https://www.denvergov.org/opendata/dataset/parking-lots-2016


Copyright © 2022 Michael D. Garber